public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/61667] setting max_load_factor of unordered_map cause buckets shrink
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-61667-4-YAyNdvQLUA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-61667-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61667

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-07-02
                 CC|                            |fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
            Version|unknown                     |4.8.2
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
François, why does __rehash_policy check for inequality?

  if (__n_bkt != _M_bucket_count)
    _M_rehash(__n_bkt, _M_rehash_policy._M_state());

Is there any reason not to change that to:

  if (__n_bkt > _M_bucket_count)
    _M_rehash(__n_bkt, _M_rehash_policy._M_state());
>From gcc-bugs-return-455483-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jul 02 09:45:08 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-455483-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7857 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2014 09:45:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7699 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jul 2014 09:44:58 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/61668] Division returns an error in some cases
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-61668-4-V2FvQYcAiG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61668-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61668-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2
Content-length: 512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida668

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Floating point numbers are not exact. 0.59 cannot be exactly represented in a
64-bit double.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-02  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-02  9:10 [Bug libstdc++/61667] New: " tinrow at gmail dot com
2014-07-02  9:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-07-23 20:07 ` [Bug libstdc++/61667] " fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-09  8:01 ` fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-09 10:19 ` fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-10  0:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-61667-4-YAyNdvQLUA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).