From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24188 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2014 09:49:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24109 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jul 2014 09:49:40 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/61728] [4.10 regression] lost symbol FUNC:_ZNK10__cxxabiv117__pbase_type_info15__pointer_catchEPKS0_PPvj@@CXXABI_1.3 Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 09:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00338.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61728 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2014-07-07 CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- This restores the missing symbol: --- a/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/cxxabi.h +++ b/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/cxxabi.h @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ namespace __cxxabiv1 virtual bool __pointer_catch(const __pbase_type_info* __thr_type, void** __thr_obj, - unsigned __outer) const = 0; + unsigned __outer) const; }; // Type information for simple pointers. But I don't know why it was made pure. Jason, was the change from inline to pure necessary to fix a failure? The function is still defined as inline in libsupc++/tinfo.h