From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24528 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2014 14:42:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24475 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jul 2014 14:42:10 -0000 From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/61737] ICE when building libgcc for cris cross-compiler Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00975.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737 --- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to dhowells@redhat.com from comment #12) > (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #6) > > Created attachment 33121 [details] > > Patch to config.gcc > > > > Correct patch to config.gcc required to actually build the compiler proper. > > Okay, I've tried that. I can't see that it makes any obvious difference. > Is there something I should look for? Oh, it wasn't meant as a fix to the problem at hand, just a replacement for the prerequisite patch. The differences to *that* one is that the duplicate t-slibgcc t-linux are removed and the comment too, after checking why I had it; likely a libgcc-related issue with headers (and so moot after the libgcc split years ago).