From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 103B13858C53; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 06:21:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 103B13858C53
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689920478;
	bh=lTDSjW1zvPOhjS87HGBmUFFG46E1lvqF2iI0yxo+AyU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=w3w6/QJaZe8B0QCxIaNOVnMP5o+/cpeN1Mz/4LjrIrM7bos5nkKiZwDl/Cdbk8h6m
	 L/Y7Kk2LCyzEW1xp68eP0F/GshxmkTcTVOu8lITtkzYVq6OFao6navLZ6g7JGTO7Pe
	 FhL06XrN7GQ3u8+YONn8yV1xlMtMfhZn3NPxDAsA=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/61747] min,max pattern not always properly
 optimized (for sse4 targets)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 06:21:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-61747-4-iqaJYraERO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61747-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61747-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61747

--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61747
>=20
> --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #8)
> >             * g++.target/i386/pr61747.C: New testcase.
>=20
> The testcase fails now, I don't know what caused it to fail though:
> FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr61747.C  -std=3Dgnu++14  scan-assembler-times max=
 4

I failed to update it before pushing, it will be fixed with the next
push I do (currently re-testing)=