From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D18ED3858417; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 05:37:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D18ED3858417 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1689917874; bh=gog1NeVmLRyLPItFY7ydjmzxDPMCDk7RSMa7EtHmUk4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=n2rq3hnowVFiMphRzsvfNcMSP12Ui6FRs1RyxBrsSkXqP97oJcGwqXMG1ZxhAmolZ CoYU9/06+HnyI3vybvdw//nKwnrWqJqGVLZ9xyfuPjBWuk2gLxOaoxBpVG6wQcHu8O /8m3pB1ry6mDF4EkAKOn31Zao+OITwG+w784HZBk= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/61747] min,max pattern not always properly optimized (for sse4 targets) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 05:37:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61747 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #8) > * g++.target/i386/pr61747.C: New testcase. The testcase fails now, I don't know what caused it to fail though: FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr61747.C -std=3Dgnu++14 scan-assembler-times max 4=