From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27791 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2014 16:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27526 invoked by uid 48); 8 Jul 2014 16:34:43 -0000 From: "personal@e-maxx.ru" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/61751] New: Empty brace-initializer causes double destruction of unique_ptr Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 16:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: personal@e-maxx.ru X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00487.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61751 Bug ID: 61751 Summary: Empty brace-initializer causes double destruction of unique_ptr Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: personal@e-maxx.ru Created attachment 33091 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33091&action=edit Full example. Use of empty brace-initializer in default function argument causes strange effects and, finally, crashes. The minimal code is: #include class A { std::unique_ptr ptr_; public: A() : ptr_(new int(123)) { } A(A&& other) : ptr_(std::move(other.ptr_)) { } }; void f(A a) { } void g(A a = {}) // replace "{}" with "A()" makes it work { f(std::move(a)); } int main() { g(); } There is a more detailed example in the attachment, which produces some debug output, e.g.: A() called [this=0x7ffffbac34f0, constructed unique_ptr=0xe18010] A(A&&) called [this=0x7ffffbac34b0, other=0x7ffffbac34d0] ~A() called [this=0x7ffffbac34b0, unique_ptr=0xe18010] ~A() called [this=0x7ffffbac34f0, unique_ptr=0xe18010] *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x0000000000e18010 *** On the contrary, using some correct version of compiler (I tried 4.6.3 and 4.9.0) we get: A() called [this=0x7fff77c52810, constructed unique_ptr=0xe1c010] A(A&&) called [this=0x7fff77c527e0, other=0x7fff77c52810] ~A() called [this=0x7fff77c527e0, unique_ptr=0xe1c010] ~A() called [this=0x7fff77c52810, unique_ptr=0] As it can be seen, the difference is that the bogus version moves from object that has never been constructed.