public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/61757] [4.10 Regression] genmodes failure with enable-checking
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-61757-4-2ekw1UMs08@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-61757-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hmm, for me a i586 bootstrap with r212352 works (x86_64 host, gcc 4.8 host
compiler) at least up to stage2 genmodes, from HJs fails it seems that only
stage3 genmodes fails (so lets wait a bit more...) which means that the stage2
compiler is miscompiled by the stage1 compiler (ugh).
Probably because of lack of time to search for the latent bug I'll end up
reverting the patch later :/ (I'll try reverting only parts of it, which
will take some extra verification time).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-10 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 7:51 [Bug bootstrap/61757] New: " dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2014-07-09 8:56 ` [Bug bootstrap/61757] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-09 10:14 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-09 11:56 ` [Bug bootstrap/61757] [4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-09 12:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/61757] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-07-09 13:09 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-07-09 20:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-10 9:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-07-10 9:39 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-10 10:29 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-07-10 14:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-10 14:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 13:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 13:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-11 14:07 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 14:26 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-07-11 16:16 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 17:24 ` matz at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 17:47 ` matz at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 18:32 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-07-11 23:03 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-13 13:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-13 17:32 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 1:23 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 8:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 9:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 9:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 10:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 10:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 17:57 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 19:15 ` law at redhat dot com
2014-07-15 7:45 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-01-16 5:37 ` law at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-61757-4-2ekw1UMs08@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).