public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/61757] [4.10 Regression] genmodes failure with enable-checking
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 08:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-61757-4-fD7JUEkLPR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-61757-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757

--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The first interesting difference is that for

  <bb 14>:
  _793 = ASSERT_EXPR <_73, _73 != 18>;
  switch (_793) <default: <L32>, case 0: <L26>, case 1: <L27>, case 2: <L28>,
case 3: <L29>, case 4 ... 9: <L28>, case 10 ... 11: <L30>, case 12 ... 17:
<L31>>

<L28>:

we record an equality instead of a range:

@@ -17655,13 +17655,7 @@

        BB #19
        EDGE 14->19 14 [14.3%]  (EXECUTABLE)
-       PREDICATE: _73 ge_expr 2
-
-       switch (_73) <default: <L32>, case 0: <L26>, case 1: <L27>, case 2:
<L28>, case 3: <L29>, case 4 ... 9: <L28>, case 10 ... 11: <L30>, case 12 ...
17: <L31>>
-
-       BB #19
-       EDGE 14->19 14 [14.3%]  (EXECUTABLE)
-       PREDICATE: _73 le_expr 9
+       PREDICATE: _73 eq_expr 2

@@ -19815,9 +19806,8 @@
   goto <bb 28>;

 <L28>:
-  _792 = ASSERT_EXPR <_794, _794 >= 2>;
-  _793 = ASSERT_EXPR <_792, _792 <= 9>;
-  _77 = _793 + 4294967288;
+  _792 = ASSERT_EXPR <_793, _793 == 2>;
+  _77 = _792 + 4294967288;
   _78 = _77 > 1;
   _79 = (requirement) _78;
   validate_mode (m_780, 2, 0, 1, 1, _79);

that's of course bogus, happens via find_switch_asserts where for correctly
sorted ci vector we fail to pick up CASE_HIGH of cast 4...9.

We miscompile the loop

          /* Skip labels until the last of the group.  */
          do {
            ++idx;
          } while (idx < n && cbb == ci[idx].bb);

to

   0x0000000000b6a492 <+3074>:  mov    %eax,%r14d
   0x0000000000b6a495 <+3077>:  lea    0x1(%r14),%r15d
=> 0x0000000000b6a499 <+3081>:  cmp    %r15,%rcx
   0x0000000000b6a49c <+3084>:  mov    %r15,%rax
   0x0000000000b6a49f <+3087>:  ja     0xb6a492
<find_assert_locations_1(basic_block, sbitmap)+3074>

that is, we simply increment idx until it is equal to n and then use
CASE_HIGH of the last case label in the vector which is the default
label (and thus does not have CASE_HIGH nor CASE_LOW).

The following testcase derived from that is miscompiled on trunk at -O2:

extern void abort (void);

struct X { void *p; int res; } a[32];

int foo (unsigned i, unsigned n, void *q)
{
  if (i + 1 < n && q == a[i + 1].p)
    {
      do {
          ++i;
      } while (i < n && q == a[i].p);
      --i;
      return a[i].res;
    }
}

int main ()
{
  int x;
  a[0].p = &x;
  a[1].p = &x;
  a[1].res = 1;
  a[2].p = (void *)0;
  a[2].res = 0;
  if (foo (0, 3, &x) != 1)
    abort ();
  return 0;
}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-14  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-09  7:51 [Bug bootstrap/61757] New: " dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2014-07-09  8:56 ` [Bug bootstrap/61757] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-09 10:14 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-09 11:56 ` [Bug bootstrap/61757] [4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-09 12:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/61757] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-07-09 13:09 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-07-09 20:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-10  9:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-10  9:39 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-10 10:29 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-07-10 14:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-10 14:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 13:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 13:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-11 14:07 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 14:26 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-07-11 16:16 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 17:24 ` matz at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 17:47 ` matz at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-11 18:32 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-07-11 23:03 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-13 13:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-13 17:32 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14  1:23 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14  8:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-07-14  9:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14  9:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14  9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 10:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 10:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 17:57 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 19:15 ` law at redhat dot com
2014-07-15  7:45 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-01-16  5:37 ` law at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-61757-4-fD7JUEkLPR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).