public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug objc++/61759] [ICE] [objc++] reaching gcc_unreachable in objc_eh_runtime_type at objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-01.c
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 11:26:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-61759-4-7L8GwHMvwc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-61759-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61759

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|*-*-darwin                  |powerpc-*-darwin,
                   |                            |i686-*-darwin

--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #14)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)

With current trunk on a cross to powerpc-apple-darwin9 this reproduces for the
runtime ABI 01 - which is used on 32b Darwin. (i.e the code compiles fine for
'-m64')

A guess would be that we have a conflict between C++ exception handling (DWARF
unwinding) and runtime-abi-01 exception handling (set jump / long jump). 
Probably, there needs to be some way to flag which kind of exception is
present.

For runtime ABI 02 (64bit) this should not happen - so the only really affected
targets are 32b powerpc and i686 Darwin.

===== backtrace for curent trunk:

  * frame #0: 0x00000001021b78a5 cc1objplus`internal_error(gmsgid="in %s, at
%s:%d") at diagnostic.cc:2166:25
    frame #1: 0x00000001021b7d8b
cc1objplus`fancy_abort(file="/src-local/gcc-master/gcc/objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-01.cc",
line=2795, function="objc_eh_runtime_type") at diagnostic.cc:2296:18
    frame #2: 0x000000010003dab7
cc1objplus`::objc_eh_runtime_type(type=0x000000011401c5e8) at
objc-next-runtime-abi-01.cc:2795:3
    frame #3: 0x00000001011501ad
cc1objplus`add_type_for_runtime(type=0x000000011401c5e8) at except.cc:683:40
    frame #4: 0x000000010114f8c4
cc1objplus`gen_eh_region_catch(t=0x0000000117c3b318,
type_or_list=0x000000011401c5e8) at except.cc:424:23
    frame #5: 0x0000000101a400bb
cc1objplus`::lower_catch(state=0x0000000309267190, tp=0x000000014813f690) at
tree-eh.cc:1815:31
    frame #6: 0x0000000101a40cfe
cc1objplus`::lower_eh_constructs_2(state=0x0000000309267190,
gsi=0x0000000309267140) at tree-eh.cc:2107:27
    frame #7: 0x0000000101a40e17
cc1objplus`::lower_eh_constructs_1(state=0x0000000309267190,
pseq=0x0000000309267188) at tree-eh.cc:2153:27
    frame #8: 0x0000000101a40f46
cc1objplus`pass_lower_eh::execute(this=0x000060000260c540,
fun=0x00000001480e8678) const at tree-eh.cc:2198:25
    frame #9: 0x00000001017b5131
cc1objplus`execute_one_pass(pass=0x000060000260c540) at passes.cc:2641:30
    frame #10: 0x00000001017b5570
cc1objplus`::execute_pass_list_1(pass=0x000060000260c540) at passes.cc:2750:28
    frame #11: 0x00000001017b5607
cc1objplus`execute_pass_list(fn=0x00000001480e8678, pass=0x000060000260c240) at
passes.cc:2761:23
    frame #12: 0x0000000100fe00c4
cc1objplus`cgraph_node::analyze(this=0x0000000148128990) at
cgraphunit.cc:694:22
    frame #13: 0x0000000100fe23d1
cc1objplus`::analyze_functions(first_time=true) at cgraphunit.cc:1247:18
    frame #14: 0x0000000100fe5ed4
cc1objplus`symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit(this=0x0000000114006000) at
cgraphunit.cc:2554:21
    frame #15: 0x0000000101987ad5 cc1objplus`::compile_file() at
toplev.cc:471:41
    frame #16: 0x000000010198b4f0 cc1objplus`::do_compile(no_backend=false) at
toplev.cc:2126:24
    frame #17: 0x000000010198ba34
cc1objplus`toplev::main(this=0x000000030926751a, argc=16,
argv=0x0000000309267668) at toplev.cc:2282:18
    frame #18: 0x0000000102187a64 cc1objplus`main(argc=16,
argv=0x0000000309267668) at main.cc:39:23

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-30 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-09 12:49 [Bug objc++/61759] New: internal compiler error: in objc_eh_runtime_type, at objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-01.c:2792 dougmencken at gmail dot com
2014-07-09 12:51 ` [Bug objc++/61759] " dougmencken at gmail dot com
2014-07-09 13:15 ` dougmencken at gmail dot com
2014-07-09 13:17 ` dougmencken at gmail dot com
2014-10-06 13:47 ` dougmencken at gmail dot com
2014-10-07 17:45 ` [Bug objc++/61759] [ICE] [objc] reaching gcc_unreachable in objc_eh_runtime_type at objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-01.c dougmencken at gmail dot com
2015-10-02  1:06 ` dougmencken at gmail dot com
2022-11-05  2:04 ` [Bug objc++/61759] [ICE] [objc++] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-05  2:14 ` vital.had at gmail dot com
2023-07-30 10:07 ` vital.had at gmail dot com
2023-07-30 10:11 ` vital.had at gmail dot com
2023-07-30 11:26 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-07-30 12:11 ` vital.had at gmail dot com
2024-03-18 13:02 ` vital.had at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-61759-4-7L8GwHMvwc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).