public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/61765] New: Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY
@ 2014-07-09 22:33 fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-09 22:37 ` [Bug fortran/61765] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-09 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61765
Bug ID: 61765
Summary: Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
gfortran 4.9 and 4.10 reject the code below with:
subroutine sub(x)
integer, intent(in) :: x
entry sub_c(x) bind(c)
end subroutine sub
a.f90:3.16-16:
entry sub_c(x) bind(c)
12
Error: Procedure sub_c with binding label sub_c at (1) uses the same global
identifier as entity at (2)
As far as I can tell, this code is standard-conforming (related to non-legal
code from PR 35031). It should be accepted.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/61765] Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY
2014-07-09 22:33 [Bug fortran/61765] New: Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-09 22:37 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-09 22:58 ` [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/4.10 Regression] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-09 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61765
Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-07-09
Blocks| |32630
Ever confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY
2014-07-09 22:33 [Bug fortran/61765] New: Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-09 22:37 ` [Bug fortran/61765] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-09 22:58 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-11-19 13:27 ` [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-07-09 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61765
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY |[4.9/4.10 Regression]
| |Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
The code is accepted up to r199034 (2013-05-17) and rejected after r199221
(2013-05-22). Likely r199118, r199119, or r199120 (pr 48858).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/5 Regression] Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY
2014-07-09 22:33 [Bug fortran/61765] New: Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-09 22:37 ` [Bug fortran/61765] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-09 22:58 ` [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/4.10 Regression] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-11-19 13:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-16 9:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-19 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61765
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/5 Regression] Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY
2014-07-09 22:33 [Bug fortran/61765] New: Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-11-19 13:27 ` [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-16 9:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-06-26 20:05 ` [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2015-02-16 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61765
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> The code is accepted up to r199034 (2013-05-17) and rejected after r199221
> (2013-05-22). Likely r199118, r199119, or r199120 (pr 48858).
It is r199120.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY
2014-07-09 22:33 [Bug fortran/61765] New: Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-16 9:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2015-06-26 20:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61765
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY
2014-07-09 22:33 [Bug fortran/61765] New: Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:05 ` [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61765
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-26 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-09 22:33 [Bug fortran/61765] New: Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-09 22:37 ` [Bug fortran/61765] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-09 22:58 ` [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/4.10 Regression] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-11-19 13:27 ` [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-16 9:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-06-26 20:05 ` [Bug fortran/61765] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).