From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-456243-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20184 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2014 03:41:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19967 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jul 2014 03:41:02 -0000
From: "kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/61795] [C++11] return type of std::pow(std::complex<float>, int) should be std::complex<double>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 03:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61795-4-hjmUeaabtD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61795-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61795-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00834.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61795

--- Comment #2 from Mitsuru Kariya <kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com> ---
I think that this behaviour is caused by r201253 (for PR57974, Comment 11).
DR844 was fixed by r136694 but reverted by r201253.

diff r135878 r136694
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/std/complex?r1=135878&r2=136694

diff r199924 r201253
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/std/complex?r1=199924&r2=201253


Moreover, I think that I mistook.

> Note that this problem does not occur in std::complex<double> and
> std::complex<long double> because there is no difference between
> C++03 and C++11.

This is not true.

In C++03, the 2nd argument of std::pow can cause implicit conversions.
(Because it is the trivial int type.)
However, I believe that it should cause no implicit conversion in C++11.
(I think so from C++11 standard text quoted above.)

Therefore, I think that the sample code below should be compiled successfully
in C++03 mode but should cause compilation error in C++11 mode.

===================================================================
#include <complex>

struct S {
  operator int() { return 1; }
};

int main()
{
  std::complex<double> d = std::pow(std::complex<double>(0), S());
}
===================================================================