From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-456929-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25257 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2014 16:34:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25166 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jul 2014 16:34:22 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/61802] [4.10 Regression] AArch64 execute.exp failures with LTO after r212467
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61802-4-sIdkgHRpAo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61802-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61802-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg01520.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> Actually at the cauldron discussion I got an idea that it may be issue with
> anchor generation
> not bringing in all the constructors. Is the problem there that constructors
> of static vairables
> are empty in the final binary?

yes.