[Bug target/61810] init-regs.c papers over issues elsewhere

["amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61810

Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> But it looks like the testcase is broken:
> 
> __attribute__((always_inline, target("avx2")))
> static __m256i
> load8bit_4x4_avx2(const uint8_t *const src, const uint32_t stride)
> { 
>   __m128i src01, src23;
>   src01 = _mm_cvtsi32_si128(*(int32_t*)(src + 0 * stride));
>   src23 = _mm_insert_epi32(src23, *(int32_t *)(src + 3 * stride), 1);
>   return _mm256_setr_m128i(src01, src23);
> }
> 
> it seems to expect that src23 is zero before inserting the data?

If you look in the original PR 104441 testcase, it has sensible code:

static __m256i __attribute__((always_inline))
load8bit_4x4_avx2(const uint8_t *const src, const uint32_t stride)
{
  __m128i src01, src23;
  src01 = _mm_cvtsi32_si128(*(int32_t*)(src + 0 * stride));
  src01 = _mm_insert_epi32(src01, *(int32_t *)(src + 1 * stride), 1);
  src23 = _mm_cvtsi32_si128(*(int32_t*)(src + 2 * stride));
  src23 = _mm_insert_epi32(src23, *(int32_t *)(src + 3 * stride), 1);
  return _mm256_setr_m128i(src01, src23);
}