public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug preprocessor/61832] New: r212638 breaks building ncurses
@ 2014-07-17 17:30 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-23 13:29 ` [Bug preprocessor/61832] [4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-24 8:22 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-17 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61832
Bug ID: 61832
Summary: r212638 breaks building ncurses
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
As of 212638:
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
* c-ppoutput.c (struct print::prev_was_system_token): New data
member.
(init_pp_output): Initialize it.
(maybe_print_line_1, maybe_print_line, print_line_1, print_line)
(do_line_change): Return a flag saying if a line marker was
emitted or not.
(scan_translation_unit): Detect if the system-ness of the token we
are about to emit is different from the one of the previously
emitted token. If so, emit a line marker. Avoid emitting useless
adjacent line markers. Avoid emitting line markers for tokens
originating from the expansion of built-in macros.
(scan_translation_unit_directives_only): Adjust.
by dodji
gcc fails to build ncurses. Basically the preprocessor ends up generating
invalid C-code.
I'll try to reduce a testcase soon, but in the meantime this appears on x86,
arm and aarch64 so should be easily reproducible
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/61832] [4.10 Regression] r212638 breaks building ncurses
2014-07-17 17:30 [Bug preprocessor/61832] New: r212638 breaks building ncurses ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-23 13:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-24 8:22 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-23 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61832
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
Summary|r212638 breaks building |[4.10 Regression] r212638
|ncurses |breaks building ncurses
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/61832] [4.10 Regression] r212638 breaks building ncurses
2014-07-17 17:30 [Bug preprocessor/61832] New: r212638 breaks building ncurses ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-23 13:29 ` [Bug preprocessor/61832] [4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-24 8:22 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-24 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61832
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm closing this as invalid.
The bug is in the ncurses build process which assumes that the preprocessor
does not introduce new lines and mangles the output with its own sed and awk
trickery which ends up stumbling on the new chanes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-24 8:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-17 17:30 [Bug preprocessor/61832] New: r212638 breaks building ncurses ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-23 13:29 ` [Bug preprocessor/61832] [4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-24 8:22 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).