From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 66EF7385BF83; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:26:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 66EF7385BF83
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1586849184;
 bh=wWsiFM87EtKexpEyClqGvvYX3IeklRHusBQ+ptz++Yk=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=gaP00Pw5hKBANWpB0s7fsshWjcrC6U39WvXLK2tbwdADsYDZ26b/U5eQcxF+aIerq
 Hpmk7u21DtM23BqpRldhNJu+pMUPZTBfaLOwb3Dea8wHAI0SYNIA1oj/sUOt9hBgmg
 JGnnsYUsQIKkUSMNodJmxOumb3rzX/YHAE0mW3lM=
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/61837] missed loop invariant expression optimization
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:26:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-61837-4-9FMZ2bxYZe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61837-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61837-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:26:24 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61837

--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
-funswitch-loops changes things like

  for (...) {
    if (...)
      ...1;
    else
      ...2;
  }

into

  if (...) {
    for (...)
      ...1;
  } else {
    for (...)
      ...2;
  }

which often is not a good idea.  This is why this is not done at -O2:
-O2 is only for optimisations that almost never hurt performance.=