From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25756 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2014 13:23:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25632 invoked by uid 48); 18 Jul 2014 13:23:36 -0000 From: "ian at airs dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug go/61840] [4.9 regression] sync/atomic FAILs on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:23:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: go X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ian at airs dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg01308.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61840 --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Please tell us what kind of system you are running on and precisely how you ran configure. The error report doesn't make sense; it seems incomplete. I don't see how the test could fail without printing out more than that. What happens if you cd into the directory x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libgo and run "make sync/atomic/check"?