[Bug c++/61856] New: Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation

[Bug c++/61856] New: Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation

[ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61856

            Bug ID: 61856
           Summary: Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com

First test:
#include <iostream>

#ifdef OK
struct ostream { } cout;

bool operator<<(ostream&, const char* s)
{ __builtin_printf("%s", s); return true; }
#else
using std::cout;
#endif

struct X { int a = (cout<<"hmm\n") ? 1 : 2;};

int main()
{
    X x;
}

With -DOK, this prints "hmm" once, otherwise it prints "hmm" twice. This
suggested
that perhaps the problem is specific to iostream, but wrapping the NSDMI into
a lambda fixes the double evaluation:

#include <iostream>

#ifdef OK
struct ostream { } cout;

bool operator<<(ostream&, const char* s)
{ __builtin_printf("%s", s); return true; }
#else
using std::cout;
#endif

struct X { int a = ([]{return bool(cout<<"hmm\n");}()) ? 1 : 2;};

int main()
{
    X x;
}

Simpler cases like just incrementing a global variable in the ternary
operator seem to work fine:

#include <iostream>

int global_x = 0;
struct X { int a = (global_x++) ? 1 : 2;};

int main()
{
    X x;
    std::cout << global_x << std::endl;
}

Perhaps this is some weird gimplification bug.

[Bug c++/61856] Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61856

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-07-20
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

[Bug c++/61856] Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation

[miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61856

Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It seems that this bug was fixed in r224533 (PR58063).

[Bug c++/61856] Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation

[ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61856

Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> ---
Fixed by the resolution of PR58063.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 58063 ***