public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/61856] New: Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation @ 2014-07-20 12:18 ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com 2014-07-20 12:19 ` [Bug c++/61856] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com @ 2014-07-20 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61856 Bug ID: 61856 Summary: Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com First test: #include <iostream> #ifdef OK struct ostream { } cout; bool operator<<(ostream&, const char* s) { __builtin_printf("%s", s); return true; } #else using std::cout; #endif struct X { int a = (cout<<"hmm\n") ? 1 : 2;}; int main() { X x; } With -DOK, this prints "hmm" once, otherwise it prints "hmm" twice. This suggested that perhaps the problem is specific to iostream, but wrapping the NSDMI into a lambda fixes the double evaluation: #include <iostream> #ifdef OK struct ostream { } cout; bool operator<<(ostream&, const char* s) { __builtin_printf("%s", s); return true; } #else using std::cout; #endif struct X { int a = ([]{return bool(cout<<"hmm\n");}()) ? 1 : 2;}; int main() { X x; } Simpler cases like just incrementing a global variable in the ternary operator seem to work fine: #include <iostream> int global_x = 0; struct X { int a = (global_x++) ? 1 : 2;}; int main() { X x; std::cout << global_x << std::endl; } Perhaps this is some weird gimplification bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/61856] Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation 2014-07-20 12:18 [Bug c++/61856] New: Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com @ 2014-07-20 12:19 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-18 16:50 ` miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-21 9:06 ` ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-20 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61856 Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2014-07-20 Ever confirmed|0 |1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/61856] Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation 2014-07-20 12:18 [Bug c++/61856] New: Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com 2014-07-20 12:19 ` [Bug c++/61856] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-18 16:50 ` miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-21 9:06 ` ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-18 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61856 Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> --- It seems that this bug was fixed in r224533 (PR58063). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/61856] Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation 2014-07-20 12:18 [Bug c++/61856] New: Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com 2014-07-20 12:19 ` [Bug c++/61856] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-18 16:50 ` miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-21 9:06 ` ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com @ 2015-06-21 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61856 Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> --- Fixed by the resolution of PR58063. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 58063 *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-21 9:06 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-07-20 12:18 [Bug c++/61856] New: Ternary operator in an NSDMI causes double evaluation ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com 2014-07-20 12:19 ` [Bug c++/61856] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-18 16:50 ` miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-21 9:06 ` ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).