public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:35:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-61886-4-cA3mZJYl9P@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-61886-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The only duplicate decls are the C extern inline __attribute__((gnu_inline)) (or -std=c89/gnu89 extern inline) or C++ inline __attribute__((gnu_inline)). We do have a middle-end representation of those, don't we? Do you have a problem that they have the same asm names, or DECL_NAME, something else? If you wanted different asm names (e.g. normal asm name plus space at the end), we'd need some code to change calls to the functions with space after it back into ones without it if inlining failed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-07 9:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-61886-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2014-07-23 10:58 ` [Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-23 11:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-23 13:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-23 13:37 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-08-27 10:00 ` [Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-08-27 14:51 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2014-08-28 8:20 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2014-09-08 0:42 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2014-09-08 7:53 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2014-10-06 20:23 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2014-10-06 20:34 ` jakub at redhat dot com 2014-10-06 22:08 ` jakub at redhat dot com 2014-10-06 22:19 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2014-10-06 22:38 ` jakub at redhat dot com 2014-10-06 22:44 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2014-10-07 5:46 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2014-10-07 9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-10-07 9:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2014-10-07 19:49 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2014-10-08 7:37 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2014-10-08 8:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-10-08 10:42 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2014-10-08 17:49 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2014-12-01 12:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-19 13:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-19 13:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-11 8:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-11 8:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-11 9:15 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-02-11 10:05 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-02-11 16:30 ` zackw at panix dot com 2015-03-03 19:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-20 21:00 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-23 8:21 ` [Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 20:10 ` [Bug lto/61886] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-61886-4-cA3mZJYl9P@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).