* [Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
2014-07-29 16:31 [Bug sanitizer/61955] New: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4 tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
@ 2014-07-29 16:37 ` tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
2014-08-22 20:45 ` tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk @ 2014-07-29 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #1 from Bruce Adams <tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk> ---
configuring with --disable-libsantizer progresses the build but it fails later
on linking cilk. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61956
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
2014-07-29 16:31 [Bug sanitizer/61955] New: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4 tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
2014-07-29 16:37 ` [Bug sanitizer/61955] " tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
@ 2014-08-22 20:45 ` tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
2014-08-22 20:45 ` tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk @ 2014-08-22 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #3 from Bruce Adams <tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk> ---
Running configure using --disable-libcilkrts (in addition to
--disable-libsanitiser) which is not documented results in a useable gcc 4.9.1
(with c++ working but presumably cilk++ broken).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
2014-07-29 16:31 [Bug sanitizer/61955] New: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4 tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
2014-07-29 16:37 ` [Bug sanitizer/61955] " tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
2014-08-22 20:45 ` tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
@ 2014-08-22 20:45 ` tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
2015-05-21 7:46 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk @ 2014-08-22 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #2 from Bruce Adams <tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk> ---
Running configure using --disable-libcilkrts (in addition to
--disable-libsanitiser) which is not documented results in a useable gcc 4.9.1
(with c++ working but presumably cilk++ broken).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
2014-07-29 16:31 [Bug sanitizer/61955] New: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4 tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-22 20:45 ` tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
@ 2015-05-21 7:46 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2015-05-21 7:49 ` dvyukov at google dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2015-05-21 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
<linux/aio_abi.h> was added in 2.5.32.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/?id=ea5097be4e814a2a9457e60653052306295941e8
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
2014-07-29 16:31 [Bug sanitizer/61955] New: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4 tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-21 7:46 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2015-05-21 7:49 ` dvyukov at google dot com
2015-05-21 7:58 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dvyukov at google dot com @ 2015-05-21 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google dot com> ---
How does LINUX_VERSION_CODE relate to linux kernel version? What is the
LINUX_VERSION_CODE value for 2.5.32? Is the other LINUX_VERSION_CODE value
(132627) correct?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
2014-07-29 16:31 [Bug sanitizer/61955] New: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4 tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-21 7:49 ` dvyukov at google dot com
@ 2015-05-21 7:58 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2015-05-21 8:09 ` dvyukov at google dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2015-05-21 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Format it as a hexadecimal number.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
2014-07-29 16:31 [Bug sanitizer/61955] New: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4 tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-21 7:58 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2015-05-21 8:09 ` dvyukov at google dot com
2015-05-21 8:22 ` ossman at cendio dot se
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dvyukov at google dot com @ 2015-05-21 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google dot com> ---
Kostya, Alexey, Eugeniy, please land this fix to llvm tree while I am OOO.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
2014-07-29 16:31 [Bug sanitizer/61955] New: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4 tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-21 8:09 ` dvyukov at google dot com
@ 2015-05-21 8:22 ` ossman at cendio dot se
2015-05-21 8:38 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ossman at cendio dot se @ 2015-05-21 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #9 from Pierre Ossman <ossman at cendio dot se> ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #5)
> <linux/aio_abi.h> was added in 2.5.32.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/
> ?id=ea5097be4e814a2a9457e60653052306295941e8
How can it be missing on RHEL 4 with 2.6.9 in that case?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
2014-07-29 16:31 [Bug sanitizer/61955] New: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4 tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-21 8:22 ` ossman at cendio dot se
@ 2015-05-21 8:38 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2015-05-21 8:50 ` ossman at cendio dot se
2021-12-19 17:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2015-05-21 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Are you sure their user-space kernel headers are at 2.6.9 level?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/?id=31a3791056e43c6dd7386b8bc0f5fb94848c5a61
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/tree/include/linux?id=31a3791056e43c6dd7386b8bc0f5fb94848c5a61
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
2014-07-29 16:31 [Bug sanitizer/61955] New: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4 tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-21 8:38 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2015-05-21 8:50 ` ossman at cendio dot se
2021-12-19 17:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ossman at cendio dot se @ 2015-05-21 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #11 from Pierre Ossman <ossman at cendio dot se> ---
Not really. :)
I stumbled upon this trying to use 2.4 headers, so I honestly haven't tried
2.6.9, RHEL variant or otherwise.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
2014-07-29 16:31 [Bug sanitizer/61955] New: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4 tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-21 8:50 ` ossman at cendio dot se
@ 2021-12-19 17:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-19 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
At this point 2.6.9 is too old of a kernel to support sanitizers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread