From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24618 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2014 23:22:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24582 invoked by uid 55); 31 Jul 2014 23:22:15 -0000 From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/61985] It's possible to declare a function pointer as noreturn using the old volatile syntax but not normally. Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 23:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg02093.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61985 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I'm afraid I can't tell what you think the bug here is. You make a true statement about C11 - that's not a bug report. You give some C code - that's not a bug report either. You don't say what GCC version or command-line options you use with the C code, or what you think GCC is doing wrong with that code, why you think that is wrong and what you think it should do instead.