From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-457812-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18651 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2014 15:36:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18585 invoked by uid 48); 5 Aug 2014 15:36:16 -0000
From: "e.menezes at samsung dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/62014] [AArch64] Using -mgeneral-regs-only may lead to ICE
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: e.menezes at samsung dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-62014-4-BRN38EsXM9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-62014-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-62014-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00309.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62014

--- Comment #9 from Evandro Menezes <e.menezes at samsung dot com> ---
It seems to me that it's the LRA which is forcing the use of FP registers, so,
even if the patterns are fixed, I believe that in the end the combiner would
just give up and ICE.  With this assumption, which is open to corrections, I
believe that the LRA needs to be properly managed according to the options
passed on to the target.