From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-474934-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21662 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2015 18:12:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21596 invoked by uid 55); 26 Jan 2015 18:12:19 -0000
From: "paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/62044] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in USE statement with RENAME for extended derived type
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-62044-4-8KgLUz8Eav@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-62044-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-62044-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg02928.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62044

--- Comment #10 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> ---
Hi Mikael,

Yes, you will see from my comment on the PR that I had come to the
same conclusion. However, rather than take PR62044 as a place holder,
I will open a new PR. Thanks for the information about the derived
type namespaces. Originally they were added with precisely this in
mind (and in fact?) but they seem to have fallen into disuse (or
not!).

Cheers

Paul

On 26 January 2015 at 13:11, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62044
>
> --- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Created attachment 34571
>   --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34571&action=edit
> segregate derived type namespaces from regular namespaces
>
> To convince yourself that sym_root fields are never used in derived type
> namespaces, here is a patch that gives a type without sym_root field to
> f2k_derived.  It passes bootstrapping.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.