From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0990F3877019; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 13:59:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0990F3877019 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1584799181; bh=/fSPfVVBay2ufyHdGmFp0Ul2oQluhxryDChto269sB0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OWbmQpjIbpb8jrxFZJfGl9CCQ+YJvC9iq68WG1qACQw3Ef/UsCN13gT6M+/9SYs8a VY+VvuIgWxLWbrYNnIAhkwUfxoYl2n+gcxAWkBTEq/+U+xp0ulf+R94GrLCClk/FjL bJN8GM30BMRzi2w5DO8nLSFgkAps7elPxIt+bLdE= From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/62051] [8/9/10 Regression] Undefined reference to vtable with -O2 and -fdevirtualize-speculatively Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 13:59:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 13:59:41 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D62051 Jan Hubicka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|8.5 |11.0 --- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka --- This is bit of a grey area of what we can/can not refer in presence of visibilities and I hope codebases are now adopted for GCC behaviour. I thi= nk we could delay this post GCC10, so re-taretting.=