From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10933 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2014 20:35:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10881 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2014 20:35:18 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/62056] Long compile times with large tuples Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 20:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D62056 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwakely.gcc at gmail dot c= om --- Comment #11 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- Jonathan, what should we do about this? Is this implementation better than = the one in libstdc++? If so, what steps are needed to get this integrated? >>From gcc-bugs-return-463061-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Oct 01 20:37:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12128 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2014 20:37:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12090 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2014 20:37:27 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/62056] Long compile times with large tuples Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 20:37:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 Content-length: 577 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D62056 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|c++ |libstdc++ --- Comment #12 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- I think this is a libstdc++ issue for now. It would be nice to have a simpl= er testcase for the g++ compile time problem, then we can open a different independent report. >>From gcc-bugs-return-463062-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Oct 01 20:41:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15527 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2014 20:41:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15237 invoked by uid 55); 1 Oct 2014 20:41:02 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/63428] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] vshuf-v4di.c miscompilation Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 20:41:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 Content-length: 611 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63428 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 1 20:40:29 2014 New Revision: 215776 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215776&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/63428 * config/i386/i386.c (expand_vec_perm_pshufb): Fix up rperm[0] argument to avx2_permv2ti. * gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-4.inc: Move test 122 from EXPTESTS to test 24 in TESTS. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-4.inc