From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4591 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2014 14:46:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4509 invoked by uid 48); 12 Aug 2014 14:46:27 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/62100] c++11 threads invoke pure virtual function on arm embedded system Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00777.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62100 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Peter A. Bigot from comment #4) > But one difference is that I'm using -std=c++1y (and sometimes -std=c++11). > Would that be enough to be an ABI change? No, it shouldn't be (if it is then it's a bug that needs to be fixed). I agree nothing looks suspicious in that output. If the separately-built libstdc++ uses different configuration that would be a problem, but it's not possible to tell from that output.