From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20235 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2014 13:34:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20158 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2014 13:33:58 -0000 From: "jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/62173] [5.0 regression] 64bit Arch can't ivopt while 32bit Arch can Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg03239.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173 --- Comment #15 from Jiong Wang --- (In reply to rguenther@suse.de from comment #14) > I'd be happy to approve such a change - maybe you can check if > it helps you and whether it passes testing and enough benchmarks? > (there is still the related code in pointer_int_sum which should > be adjusted accordingly) thanks for these explanation and information. Need some time to digest :) Sure, I will test it and check benchmarks.