public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "miles at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/62179] undefined reference linking failure when combining "extern template" Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:24:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-62179-4-Jvd9iZMjfb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-62179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62179 --- Comment #2 from miles at gnu dot org --- Sorry, that got submitted accidentally (it turns out that RET in the web page Summary text-box is bound to "submit"!).... I'm not sure how to delete a bogus report... ^^; Could you delete that? [I updated my copy of gcc and it seems the bug I was going to report _may_ have been fixed.... but I'm running into other problems so I'm not sure yet.] Thanks, -miles 2014年8月19日火曜日、rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>さんは書きました: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62179 > > Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING > Last reconfirmed| |2014-08-19 > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > > --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Waiting for ... the bugreport? Testcase? > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. > >From gcc-bugs-return-458760-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Aug 19 09:37:20 2014 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-458760-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25617 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2014 09:37:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25572 invoked by uid 48); 19 Aug 2014 09:37:15 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/40989] -Werror= and #pragma diagnostics do not work with group flags Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:37:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: <bug-40989-4-5FEmUv2RjI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-40989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-40989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01257.txt.bz2 Content-length: 611 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40989 Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I consider this FIXED. Almost all options now work. The ones that don't are due to missing features in the *.opt files, which are tracked in PR53063. >From gcc-bugs-return-458761-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Aug 19 09:40:13 2014 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-458761-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28225 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2014 09:40:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28193 invoked by uid 48); 19 Aug 2014 09:40:09 -0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/62182] New: New warning wished: operator== and "equality comparison result unused [-Wunused-comparison]"/-Wunsed-value Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc Message-ID: <bug-62182-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01258.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1452 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idb182 Bug ID: 62182 Summary: New warning wished: operator== and "equality comparison result unused [-Wunused-comparison]"/-Wunsed-value Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org CC: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org For a simple: int i; i == 5; GCC diagnoses (but warning is enabled not by default): warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value] i == 7; CLANG does the same (warning enabled by default): warning: equality comparison result unused [-Wunused-comparison] i == 7; ~~^~~~ note: use '=' to turn this equality comparison into an assignment i == 7; ^~ However, in our code C++ code, we used an operator==. In that case, GCC doesn't warn while Clang does (by default): foo.cc:6:7: warning: equality comparison result unused [-Wunused-comparison] str == "bar"; ~~~~^~~~~~~~ foo.cc:6:7: note: use '=' to turn this equality comparison into an assignment str == "bar"; ^~ C++ test case: #include <stdio.h> #include <string> int main() { std::string str("init"); str == "bar"; printf("%s\n", str.c_str()); return 0; }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-19 9:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-08-19 6:33 [Bug lto/62179] New: " miles at gnu dot org 2014-08-19 9:24 ` miles at gnu dot org [this message] 2014-08-19 12:14 ` [Bug lto/62179] " glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-62179-4-Jvd9iZMjfb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).