From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5571 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2014 23:20:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5519 invoked by uid 48); 24 Aug 2014 23:19:59 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/62227] Templated move not elided Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01672.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62227 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- C++11 says "When certain criteria are met, an implementation is allowed to omit the copy/move construction of a class object, even if the copy/move constructor..." which only applies to copy constructors or move constructors. But the current draft says "even if the constructor selected for the copy/move operation" So it does seem that elision is now allowed when the relevant constructor is a template.