From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-459108-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8393 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2014 19:03:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8372 invoked by uid 48); 23 Aug 2014 19:03:34 -0000
From: "0xd34df00d at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/62241] C++14 generalized lambda capture doesn't work with uniform initialization syntax.
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 19:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: 0xd34df00d at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-62241-4-zNDvFvBHvW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-62241-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-62241-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01605.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62241

--- Comment #4 from Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d at gmail dot com> ---
Also, while experimenting I've found that adding a non-initializing capture
element to the list somewhat mitigates the issue. That is, if the capture list
looks like `[smth, foo = bar]`, then everything builds fine.