From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25289 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2014 18:42:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25259 invoked by uid 48); 23 Aug 2014 18:42:23 -0000 From: "0xd34df00d at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/62241] New: C++14 generalized lambda capture doesn't work with uniform initialization syntax. Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 18:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: 0xd34df00d at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01601.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62241 Bug ID: 62241 Summary: C++14 generalized lambda capture doesn't work with uniform initialization syntax. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: 0xd34df00d at gmail dot com Created attachment 33386 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33386&action=edit Failing code Passing a lambda copying a value in its capture clause in a braced-init-list causes the compiler to issue `error: 'foo' was not declared in this scope`, where `foo` is the name of the copy. Important part is the error only happens if using the uniform initialization syntax. If the lambda is passed to a class ctor invoked via the standard '()' syntax, everything works fine. This is reproducible on 4.9.0 and 4.9.1 for me. I haven't had a chance to test 4.9.2 though.