[Bug fortran/62245] gfortran miscompiles int() on mips

["Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62245

--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
(In reply to Julian Taylor from comment #7)
> But the docs indicate that there is no undefined behavior.
> As I interpret them the result of int() is always well defined.
> If the documentation would not state what happens in the case of overflow it
> would be fine to not mention it, but as is one has to know the standard to
> know that this part of the documentation is wrong.

I'll submit a patchlet to clarify the wording in the docs (the issue is the use
of range vs magnitude, which suggests defining behavior in the case of
overflow).