[Bug c++/62282] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Undefined reference with __inline __attribute(__gnu_inline__) with -O0

["dmitry.petroff at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282

--- Comment #11 from Dmitry Petrov <dmitry.petroff at gmail dot com> ---
>Which of the above mentioned semantics you want for your inlines?
Semantics that would allow me get code that links even with -O0 without need to
dublicate function body.

I can understand how this code can produce an undefined reference:

// === cut ===
__inline
__attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__))
int test(int v)
{
    return v;
}

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    return test(argc);
}
// === cut ===

With -O0 gcc is not inlining, then __inline + gnu_inline comes into play by
prohibiting generation test's body. So there's main function that has "call
U(_Z4testi)" instruction but there's no way to actually get test address. That
is logical, but insane.

Is there an easy way to get debugger-friendly (-O0) compiler output other than
provide an exact function copy but without __inline
__attribute__((__gnu_inline__))?
>From what I see, I have to pipe gperf's output to sed -e
's/__gnu__inline__/\0,__always_inline__/', but this seems so ugly that GNU
tools cannot cooperate with each other.