From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 980EB385E449; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 21:27:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 980EB385E449 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710538043; bh=MAEHfqx5Q01sXDvyAA2OjopDsbRW45l7+1eFjYJbY4k=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Mhu5o1+CDXlV8Jm8iGuiD+IuOCPBcCMFualhDtbMkH3gw3g150Zuf+m5uFAMVeRBq D7tiqZ/1/1YLOShgiZ95mWMOnNw2OxBetoJuKUaAdqZ7YCnCfj9BPOXIkVcXONxvtE z2OuhKVLhwv+ghfDVFbpNPA/DxB3qcFD5mbdPdiA= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 21:27:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D62283 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |WAITING --- Comment #33 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Why should this be a fortran bug? Can't we reassign it to target or middle-end?=