From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21620 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2014 20:58:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21430 invoked by uid 48); 1 Sep 2014 20:57:56 -0000 From: "rafael.espindola at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/62306] [4.9/5 Regression?] Change in the comdat used for constructors Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rafael.espindola at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306 --- Comment #2 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- This is again visible on trunk now that pr62302 has been fixed (thanks!). It doesn't seem profitable to ever put D0 in the D5 comdat. It cannot be equal to D1 or D2, so putting it there just constrains the linker unnecessarily.