public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/62306] [4.9/5 Regression?] Change in the comdat used for constructors
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-62306-4-n7am9qoYdk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-62306-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-08-29
CC|jason at redhat dot com |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So, the change to use D5 for the deleting dtor was deliberate when we started
using D5 for the base/complete dtor aliases in 4.5. Then 4.7 started using D0
again for some reason, and then 4.9 went back to D5.
Jakub, do you remember why you wanted to put the deleting dtor in D5 in the
first place? The gcc-patches threads don't seem to mention why.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/threads.html#00700
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/threads.html#01768
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/threads.html#00023
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-29 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-29 14:22 [Bug c++/62306] New: " rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
2014-08-29 20:16 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-09-01 20:58 ` [Bug c++/62306] " rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
2014-09-02 15:33 ` rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
2014-09-02 15:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-02 16:24 ` rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
2014-09-02 18:04 ` rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
2014-09-03 20:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-03 20:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-04 18:01 ` rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
2014-09-10 18:35 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-10 18:40 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-62306-4-n7am9qoYdk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).