From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9702 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2015 19:08:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9630 invoked by uid 55); 7 Feb 2015 19:07:58 -0000 From: "dave.anglin at bell dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/62631] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c FAILs Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 19:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dave.anglin at bell dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00673.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631 --- Comment #25 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-02-06, at 6:33 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Correction: we have only one IV on the PA, but it's 'i' and not 'p'. > > Dave, is the generated code optimimal on the PA or should the compiler use 'p'? The generated code on PA looks optimal to me: zdep %r25,29,30,%r28 b .L2 ldi 99,%r19 .L6: zdep %r25,29,30,%r28 .L2: addl %r26,%r28,%r28 ldo 1(%r25),%r25 comb,>>= %r19,%r25,.L6 stw %r0,0(%r28) bv,n %r0(%r2) Dave -- John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net