From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-464503-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26535 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2014 10:49:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26472 invoked by uid 48); 20 Oct 2014 10:49:49 -0000
From: "fei.yang0953 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63173] performance problem with simd intrinsics vld2_dup_* on aarch64-none-elf
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fei.yang0953 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fei.yang0953 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63173-4-K4GXx3XrlC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63173-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63173-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg01524.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63173

--- Comment #7 from Fei Yang <fei.yang0953 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to clyon from comment #6)
> (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #5)
> (In reply to
> Venkataramanan from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Fei Yang from comment #3)
>
> > > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #1)
> > > > Confirmed.
> > > 
> > >
> Feel free to propose a patch for them on gcc-patches along the
> > > > lines
> you described in:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-09/msg00046.html
> >
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >   To let you know, we are currently working on this
> issue.
> > >   We are implementing these with builtins.
> > >   Hopefully,
> the patch will be posted this week. Thank you.
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Fei Yang,
>
> > 
> > Ok no issues. I will let you do this. But please asign (In reply to
> Fei Yang
> > from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #1)
>
> > > > Confirmed.
> > > 
> > > Feel free to propose a patch for them on
> gcc-patches along the
> > > > lines you described in:
> > >
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-09/msg00046.html
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > >   To
> let you know, we are currently working on this issue.
> > >   We are
> implementing these with builtins.
> > >   Hopefully, the patch will be
> posted this week. Thank you.
> > 
> > Ok. Next time please assign the
> Bugzilla item to your name, so that we wont
> > be duplicating the work.
> 
> > 
> Linaro / Charles Bayliss was already working on this - he had patches
> out in
> September for this.

It seems that Charles' patches cover
> vldX_lane, but not vldX_dup.

Hi Ramana,
  Do you mean this link:
    https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00678.html