public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2" basic block vectorized using SLP" 1
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 16:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-63175-4-HOP3x74vyA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-63175-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
>
> --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
> >
> > --- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > Following up on my comment #14, and as requested on gcc-patches, the test case
> > below is vectorized with GCC 4.8.2 for T being either 32 bits wide (e.g., int)
> > or 64-bits wide (e.g., long or long long) but not with the fix referenced in
> > comment #13. The difference between the test in costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c and the
> > code here is that unlike the source, the destination of the copy isn't aligned
> > on an even element boundary.
> >
> > const T a [] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
> > extern T b[sizeof a / sizeof *a];
> >
> > void g (void)
> > {
> > const T *p = a;
> > T *q = b + 1;
> >
> > *q++ = *p++;
> > *q++ = *p++;
> > *q++ = *p++;
> > *q++ = *p++;
> > }
> >
> > In addition to this failure (mentioned on the list) the latest trunk also fails
> > to vectorize the following code which is successfully vectorized by 4.8.2. The
> > difference is that the arrays are only declared here while in
> > costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c they are defined. I only noticed this now, and so it's
> > not being exercised in the proposed enhanced test submitted to gcc-patches last
> > Friday,
> >
> > extern const T a [];
> > extern T b[];
> >
> > void g (void)
> > {
> > const T *p = a + 1;
> > T *q = b;
> >
> > *q++ = *p++;
> > *q++ = *p++;
> > *q++ = *p++;
> > *q++ = *p++;
> > }
>
> Both is because powerpc simply cannot handle unaligned stores and
> in neither testcase we can force its alignemnt (it's "extern", and
> for the first case aligning the first element won't align the
> vector store)
How does GCC 4.8 generated vectorized code look like?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-02 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-63175-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-09-05 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-30 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24 13:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-21 20:07 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-22 20:38 ` macro@linux-mips.org
2015-02-24 6:56 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-25 20:45 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-26 10:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-26 10:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-27 9:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-27 9:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-27 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-27 11:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-28 9:26 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 14:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 16:24 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 16:48 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-02 16:50 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2015-03-02 16:58 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 17:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-02 18:13 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 18:23 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-03 5:10 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-03 9:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-03 9:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-03 15:05 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-03 16:19 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-03 16:22 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04 1:15 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04 9:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04 13:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04 13:55 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-06 18:44 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-07 16:19 ` [Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9 " law at redhat dot com
2015-03-10 21:07 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-11 10:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-23 18:58 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-29 16:49 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-63175-4-HOP3x74vyA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).