public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2" basic block vectorized using SLP" 1
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-63175-4-bwAaW4u7ny@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-63175-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175

--- Comment #31 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #27)
> On the other hand, the vectorizer tuning is encoding x86 preferences.

Huh, the vectorizer tuning is specified by target hooks.  And initial
vectorizer tuning was solely for powerpc (likewise for the cost model).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-04  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-63175-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-09-05  8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-30 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24 13:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-21 20:07 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-22 20:38 ` macro@linux-mips.org
2015-02-24  6:56 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-25 20:45 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-26 10:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-26 10:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-27  9:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-27  9:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-27 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-27 11:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-28  9:26 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 14:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 16:24 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 16:48 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-02 16:50 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-02 16:58 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 17:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-02 18:13 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 18:23 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-03  5:10 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-03  9:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-03  9:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-03 15:05 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-03 16:19 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-03 16:22 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04  1:15 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04  9:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-03-04 13:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04 13:55 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-06 18:44 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-07 16:19 ` [Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9 " law at redhat dot com
2015-03-10 21:07 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-11 10:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-23 18:58 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-29 16:49 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-63175-4-bwAaW4u7ny@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).