public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2" basic block vectorized using SLP" 1 Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 09:26:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-63175-4-ok6w79srjl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-63175-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175 --- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Richard, thank you for the patch. It resolves the regression in the quality of the code generated for the test on ppc64 (I am yet to test other ppc variants). Unfortunately, while working on an improved test for the vectorization I uncovered another regression in this area that manifests itself when the destination address (as opposed to the source address) is not aligned as expected. I posted the enhanced test to the list: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01736.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-28 1:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-63175-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2014-09-05 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-10-30 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-24 13:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-21 20:07 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-22 20:38 ` macro@linux-mips.org 2015-02-24 6:56 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-25 20:45 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-26 10:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-26 10:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-27 9:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-27 9:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-27 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-27 11:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-28 9:26 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-03-02 14:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-02 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-02 16:24 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-02 16:48 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-03-02 16:50 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-03-02 16:58 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-02 17:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-03-02 18:13 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-02 18:23 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-03-03 5:10 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-03 9:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-03-03 9:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-03 15:05 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-03 16:19 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-03 16:22 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-04 1:15 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-04 9:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-04 13:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-04 13:55 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-03-06 18:44 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-07 16:19 ` [Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9 " law at redhat dot com 2015-03-10 21:07 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-11 10:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-23 18:58 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-29 16:49 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-63175-4-ok6w79srjl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).