From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-465205-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21478 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2014 09:25:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21430 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2014 09:24:55 -0000
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/63210] ira does not select the best register compared with gcc 4.8 for ARM THUMB1
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-63210-4-Yw2LShUkuB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63210-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63210-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg02226.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63210

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.0

--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Zhenqiang Chen from comment #4)
> (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #3)
> > Fixed is it? And does it fail in GCC 4.9 ?
> 
> Fixed on trunk. Same fail in GCC 4.9.
> 
> It is a performance issue. Do you think it is OK for 4.9?

If it is a 4.9 regression you should be marking it as so in the bug report-
change the title to [4.9 regression] and fill up the "Known to Fail" fields.

I cannot possibly comment if it is suitable for 4.9 branch or not.

I'm marking this as fixed for 5.0 - if you get this backported please remember
to change the target milestone to the appropriate 4.9 milestone.