public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "leis at in dot tum.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/63233] New: Valid out of bounds access leads to undefined behavior
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-63233-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63233

            Bug ID: 63233
           Summary: Valid out of bounds access leads to undefined behavior
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: major
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: leis at in dot tum.de

Consider the following (minimized) program:

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>

struct Foo {
   int a[1];
   int b;
};

int main(int argc, char** argv) {
   int index = atoi(argv[1]);

   struct Foo foo;
   foo.a[1] = 99;

   printf("%d\n", foo.a[index]);

   return 0;
}

When compiled with -O1 or higher and called with 1 as command line argument an
undefined value instead of 99 is printed. In my understanding of the standard,
foo.a is a pointer and foo.a[1] is simply (foo.a+1), which is a perfectly fine
memory address.

This program always prints the expected value (99) with clang (3.5) and icc
(14) on all optimization levels. In gcc 4.3.4 I get the expected result on -O0
and -O1 but not on -O2 or -O3.


             reply	other threads:[~2014-09-11 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-11 21:15 leis at in dot tum.de [this message]
2014-09-11 21:29 ` [Bug c/63233] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-11 22:02 ` [Bug c/63233] Missing Warray-bounds warning for array within struct manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-11 22:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-11 22:26 ` leis at in dot tum.de
2014-09-13  9:36 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-63233-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).