From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-473328-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17254 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2015 11:17:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17216 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jan 2015 11:17:15 -0000
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63234] arm used label is removed
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc cf_known_to_work everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-63234-4-ecELIq9u0q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63234-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63234-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg01322.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63234

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|2014-09-15 00:00:00         |2015-01-15
                 CC|                            |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
      Known to work|                            |5.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
      Known to fail|                            |4.9.2

--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Not sure if this is target or what in this particular case. But sure, confirmed
on 4.9 but works on 5.0.