* [Bug debug/63285] [4.9/5 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure
[not found] <bug-63285-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2014-09-17 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-18 16:56 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-17 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note the PR61923 fix has been applied also to the 4.8 branch, but this testcase
doesn't fail there (presumably latent issue there).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/63285] [4.9/5 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure
[not found] <bug-63285-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-09-17 10:46 ` [Bug debug/63285] [4.9/5 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-09-18 16:56 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-18 19:14 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-18 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
it is a bit different situation from PR61923: debug insns after the asm.
I'll submit the patch today.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/63285] [4.9/5 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure
[not found] <bug-63285-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-09-17 10:46 ` [Bug debug/63285] [4.9/5 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-18 16:56 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-09-18 19:14 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-22 10:19 ` [Bug debug/63285] [4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-18 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Sep 18 19:14:19 2014
New Revision: 215364
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215364&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-18 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR debug/63285
* haifa-sched.c (schedule_block): Advance cycle at the end of BB
if advance != 0.
2014-09-18 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR debug/63285
* gcc.target/i386/pr63285.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63285.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/haifa-sched.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/63285] [4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure
[not found] <bug-63285-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-18 19:14 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-09-22 10:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-29 15:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-22 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-09-22
Known to work| |5.0
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] |[4.9 Regression]
|-fcompare-debug scheduler |-fcompare-debug scheduler
|related failure |related failure
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.9.1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk sofar.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/63285] [4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure
[not found] <bug-63285-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-22 10:19 ` [Bug debug/63285] [4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-09-29 15:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-01 1:57 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-29 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Vlad, do you plan to apply this to 4.9 and 4.8 branches too?
For 4.9, I've bootstrapped/regtested it on {x86_64,i686,armv7hl,aarch64}-linux.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/63285] [4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure
[not found] <bug-63285-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-29 15:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-10-01 1:57 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-01 5:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-01 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Vlad, do you plan to apply this to 4.9 and 4.8 branches too?
> For 4.9, I've bootstrapped/regtested it on
> {x86_64,i686,armv7hl,aarch64}-linux.
Yes, I have plans to commit it for the branches this week. Simply, I wanted to
wait a bit in case if somebody finds issues with the patch.
Jakub, I can do it tomorrow if you want and there are deadlines with releases.
Please, just let me know if there are any deadlines.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/63285] [4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure
[not found] <bug-63285-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-10-01 1:57 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-10-01 5:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-01 14:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-14 13:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-01 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> > Vlad, do you plan to apply this to 4.9 and 4.8 branches too?
> > For 4.9, I've bootstrapped/regtested it on
> > {x86_64,i686,armv7hl,aarch64}-linux.
>
> Yes, I have plans to commit it for the branches this week. Simply, I wanted
> to wait a bit in case if somebody finds issues with the patch.
>
> Jakub, I can do it tomorrow if you want and there are deadlines with
> releases. Please, just let me know if there are any deadlines.
That would be nice, we should release 4.9.2-rc1 this or next week.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/63285] [4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure
[not found] <bug-63285-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-10-01 5:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-10-01 14:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-14 13:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-01 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Oct 1 14:42:46 2014
New Revision: 215766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-09-18 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR debug/63285
* haifa-sched.c (schedule_block): Advance cycle at the end of BB
if advance != 0.
* gcc.target/i386/pr63285.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63285.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/haifa-sched.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/63285] [4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure
[not found] <bug-63285-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-10-01 14:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-10-14 13:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-14 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread