public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug lto/63286] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196
@ 2014-09-17 14:46 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-09-17 17:35 ` [Bug lto/63286] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-09-17 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286
Bug ID: 63286
Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2
cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com, hubicka at ucw dot cz, iains at gcc dot gnu.org
The following tests have started to fail after r215196 (see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2014-09/msg00067.html) with both -m32 and
-m64:
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -flto
-flto-partition=none (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, -O2 -flto
-flto-partition=none (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -flto
-flto-partition=1to1 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, -O2 -flto
-flto-partition=1to1 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -flto
(internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, -O2 -flto (internal
compiler error)
The ICE is
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/20101014-2_0.C:8:23: sorry,
unimplemented: mangling save_expr
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/20101014-2_0.C:8:49: internal compiler
error: in verify_curr_properties, at passes.c:1862
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/63286] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196
2014-09-17 14:46 [Bug lto/63286] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-09-17 17:35 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-19 16:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-17 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2014-09-17
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I am testing:
Index: tree.c
===================================================================
--- tree.c (revision 215328)
+++ tree.c (working copy)
@@ -5003,6 +5003,7 @@ need_assembler_name_p (tree decl)
&& decl == TYPE_NAME (TREE_TYPE (decl))
&& !is_lang_specific (TREE_TYPE (decl))
&& AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (decl))
+ && variably_modified_type_p (TREE_TYPE (decl), NULL_TREE)
&& !type_in_anonymous_namespace_p (TREE_TYPE (decl)))
return !DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME_SET_P (decl);
/* Only FUNCTION_DECLs and VAR_DECLs are considered. */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/63286] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196
2014-09-17 14:46 [Bug lto/63286] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-09-17 17:35 ` [Bug lto/63286] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-09-19 16:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-09-19 18:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-09-19 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> I am testing:
> Index: tree.c
> ...
AFAICT the patch in comment 1 does not fix the PR.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/63286] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196
2014-09-17 14:46 [Bug lto/63286] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-09-17 17:35 ` [Bug lto/63286] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-19 16:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-09-19 18:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-19 21:38 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-22 10:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-19 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Sep 19 18:54:23 2014
New Revision: 215403
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215403&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/63286
* tree.c (need_assembler_name_p): Do not mangle variadic types.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/63286] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196
2014-09-17 14:46 [Bug lto/63286] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-19 18:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-09-19 21:38 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-22 10:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-19 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/63286] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196
2014-09-17 14:46 [Bug lto/63286] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-19 21:38 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-09-22 10:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-22 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-22 10:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-17 14:46 [Bug lto/63286] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-09-17 17:35 ` [Bug lto/63286] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-19 16:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-09-19 18:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-19 21:38 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-22 10:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).