From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24402 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2014 14:36:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24356 invoked by uid 48); 24 Sep 2014 14:36:20 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/63326] pragma GCC causes wrong code generation Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:36:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc resolution everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg02270.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D63326 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Last reconfirmed| |2014-09-24 CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|INVALID |--- Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- If you use #pragma GCC system_header, you get a different result, so this s= eems a bug to me (whatever the behavior, it should not depend on the type of #pragma). At the very least, GCC could give a warning if the #pragma is the only statement in a if/else/while/do/for body, since this is probably a bug. >>From gcc-bugs-return-462437-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Sep 24 14:38:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26680 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2014 14:38:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26283 invoked by uid 48); 24 Sep 2014 14:38:12 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/63326] whether a #pragma is a statement depends on the type of pragma Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:38:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg02271.txt.bz2 Content-length: 192 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D63326 --- Comment #4 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- When compiled with Clang, it returns 0 by the way. >>From gcc-bugs-return-462438-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Sep 24 14:41:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4635 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2014 14:41:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4612 invoked by uid 48); 24 Sep 2014 14:41:56 -0000 From: "richard at netbsd dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/63352] problem with fmt_g0_1.f08 on i386-pc-solaris2.11 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:41:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: richard at netbsd dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg02272.txt.bz2 Content-length: 257 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63352 --- Comment #2 from Richard PALO --- FWIW, just checked ... this is a regression introduce after 4.7.3 (where this test seems to work fine...can't test 4.8.3 any more, sorry).