From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 12248385DC31; Fri,  8 Mar 2024 13:47:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 12248385DC31
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709905645;
	bh=l1bXFvZDhnHzyB8ieuvz92vNCPCWWtqsbEUcrnhk568=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kUf8ZfAdQWtxQ+tY9miEJnoTSEg2Awi73W6qgSbByKQ6RCsPYTVPIX6cgRs6bOpSr
	 YknL0Xp5shMNRBqXYGL1GfQ+r/RlpGprRu9cyZncJZ2uWXgNWUJBPkpM6umLLMCKb+
	 7waB/wbPv4dTLdnj3bDx2hFH1x2rB/wFEHLsdrhs=
From: "vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/63400] [C++11]precision of
 std::chrono::high_resolution_clock
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 13:47:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-63400-4-pjw5K2xmHs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63400-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63400-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D63400

--- Comment #13 from Vadim Zeitlin <vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> > Is this still an issue in 2022?
> >=20
> > Using a mingw-w64 cross-compiler and running under Wine I get:
> >=20
> > CLOCK_REALTIME: 0,100
> > CLOCK_MONOTONIC: 0,100
> >=20
> > Is that just because I'm using Wine not real Windows?
>=20
> I still want an answer to this question though.

FWIW I can confirm that running the program above compiled with gcc-mingw-w=
64
12.2.0-14+25.2 from Debian 12 under Windows 10.0.19044.3803 produces exactly
the same output.=