From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16125 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2014 12:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16061 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2014 12:55:56 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/63421] GCC generates a very misleading warning when looking at an erroneously-overloaded type Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D63421 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- Duplicate. There is a bug in the pretty-printer and also we should do typed= ef unwrapping in the C FE. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 56980 *** >>From gcc-bugs-return-463018-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Oct 01 12:56:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19135 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2014 12:56:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19086 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2014 12:56:54 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/63422] [5.0 Regression] ICE in freqs_to_counts_path, at tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:981 Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1939 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D63422 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 33636 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D33636&action=3Dedit testcase Here is a relative small testcase: markus@x4 /tmp % g++ -flto -fprofile-use -fno-exceptions -std=3Dgnu++0x -O2 mozilla-xremote-client.ii XRemoteClient.ii /var/tmp/mozilla-central/widget/xremoteclient/mozilla-xremote-client.cpp: In function =E2=80=98main=E2=80=99: /var/tmp/mozilla-central/widget/xremoteclient/mozilla-xremote-client.cpp:16= :5: internal compiler error: in freqs_to_counts_path, at tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:988 int main(int argc, char **argv) ^ 0xb00cf0 freqs_to_counts_path ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:988 0xb00cf0 ssa_fix_duplicate_block_edges(redirection_data*, ssa_local_info_t*) ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:1061 0xb02260 ssa_fixup_template_block ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:1301 0xb02260 traverse_noresize ../../gcc/gcc/hash-table.h:942 0xb02260 traverse ../../gcc/gcc/hash-table.h:964 0xb02260 thread_block_1 ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:1523 0xb02994 thread_block ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:1560 0xb031dd thread_through_all_blocks(bool) ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c:2279 0xb856a1 finalize_jump_threads ../../gcc/gcc/tree-vrp.c:9856 0xb856a1 execute_vrp ../../gcc/gcc/tree-vrp.c:10010 0xb856a1 execute ../../gcc/gcc/tree-vrp.c:10073 Please submit a full bug report, >>From gcc-bugs-return-463017-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Oct 01 12:56:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16737 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2014 12:56:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16092 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2014 12:55:57 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/56980] C pretty-printer does not handle well pointer to typedef of struct Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 Content-length: 544 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D56980 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gccbugs at dima dot secret= sauce.ne | |t --- Comment #6 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- *** Bug 63421 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** >>From gcc-bugs-return-463019-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Oct 01 13:09:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28913 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2014 13:09:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28852 invoked by uid 55); 1 Oct 2014 13:09:42 -0000 From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/59805] invalid preprocessing directive not diagnosed with assembler-with-cpp Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 13:09:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 Content-length: 337 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59805 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- If there's something in the preprocessor that does this deliberately for assembler-with-cpp instead of being an accidental consequence of something else, then it's probably working as designed.