From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 98291 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2015 16:45:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98248 invoked by uid 48); 4 Aug 2015 16:45:53 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/63510] Wrong line number in Wstrict-overflow message Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:45:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D63510 --- Comment #6 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #5) > I can still reproduce the wrong-line diagnostic using gcc (GCC) 6.0.0 > 20150720 (experimental). >=20 > However GDB has been building just fine for a while now. But I don't know > if that is due to a change on GCC or GDB side. Probably GDB worked around the issue or silence the warning via #pragma. Th= at doesn't mean that the bug is fixed. >>From gcc-bugs-return-494102-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Aug 04 16:48:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102785 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2015 16:48:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102367 invoked by uid 48); 4 Aug 2015 16:48:35 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/67116] incorrect detection of thread model when cross-compiling the tool chain Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 Content-length: 474 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67116 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Cezary =C5=9Aliwa from comment #2) > This is a quite special case, target and host architecture are the same, > only the thread models are different. I think libstdc++ uses the > preinstalled compiler rather that the one just built.=20 If that is happening it's certainly a bug. Could you attach the $target/libstdc++-v3/config.log please? >>From gcc-bugs-return-494103-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Aug 04 16:50:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 110394 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2015 16:50:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 110356 invoked by uid 55); 4 Aug 2015 16:50:26 -0000 From: "nsz at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/66731] vnmul, fnmul patterns incorrect for -frounding-math Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: nsz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: nsz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 Content-length: 598 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66731 --- Comment #9 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Tue Aug 4 16:49:54 2015 New Revision: 226588 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226588&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix broken backport patch. gcc: Backport from mainline: 2015-08-04 Szabolcs Nagy PR target/66731 * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_rtx_costs): Fix NEG cost for FNMUL. (aarch64_rtx_mult_cost): Fix MULT cost with -frounding-math. Modified: branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c